A brick wall with a poster that says "yes" and a poster that says "no."

Actionstep or Zola Suite?

How I decide which partner will move the needle for a law‑firm client.

“The best platform is the one that bends, without breaking, around the way your firm really works.” — Nic Perry, Founder, Mauve Morpho

Last spring, a litigation partner called me in a panic.

Their brand-new practice‑management system looked great in demos, but come Tuesday at 4 p.m., the paralegal’s “next‑docket shuffle” routine still lived in a spreadsheet and a pile of Post‑its. Automation? Zero. Morale? Same.

That’s when it clicked (again): flashy features don’t matter if the software can’t handle the weird‑but‑critical chores that keep a file moving in the real world.

So when firms ask me, “Actionstep or Zola Suite?” I skip the marketing decks and run the Tuesday‑at‑4 p.m. test. 

Quick Decision Cheat Sheet

Need out-of-the-box billing & accounting with zero fuss

  • Zola Suite: ✅ Native, all-in-one billing + accounting.

  • Actionstep (via Mauve Morpho): ✅ Native too—plus optional Billing Interest Calculator if you need tiered rates or partial-month proration.

Heavy document automation & mail-merge templates

  • Zola Suite: ⚠️ Limited—partners lean on Word add-ins.

  • Actionstep: ✅ Leverages Actionstep Builder + Field Helper pack for deep automation.

Complex, multi-practice workflows

  • Zola Suite: ⚠️ Can feel rigid once you leave the defaults.

  • Actionstep: ✅ Unlimited matter types and custom triggers.

CRM-style marketing & intake

  • Zola Suite: ⚠️ Basic lead-capture fields only.

  • Actionstep: ✅ Native CRM or seamless Lawmatics ↔ Actionstep integration.

Large data migration from a legacy system

  • Zola Suite: Results depend on which partner you hire.

  • Actionstep: In-house migration team—50k+ matters moved so far.

Ongoing tweaks & support after go-live

  • Zola Suite: Often time-boxed engagements.

  • Actionstep: We stay on retainer—“your favorite consultant’s consultant.”

Why firms call us after a “good‑enough” Zola build stalls

Eveliina (our chief Actionstep consultant) stepped into a Zola project that looked finished on paper:

  • “Workflows were there, but the staff still kept side spreadsheets because Zola couldn’t fire follow‑ups the way they needed.”

  • Duplicate entries crept in because tags wouldn’t sync to their marketing funnel.

  • Month‑end trust reconciliation still landed in Excel.

We rebuilt the matter flow in Actionstep, added a one‑click ‘Next Task’ view, and the firm ditched three external spreadsheets in the first week.

Case Study #1 – Lawmatics ↔ Actionstep integration

For firms who love Zola’s built‑in CRM but outgrow its triggers.

“The minute a lead converts, everything — contacts, custom fields, documents — shoots straight into the matter. No swivel‑chair data entry.” — Nic

Before

  • Manual CSV uploads from Lawmatics → Zola → errors

  • 15 min average lag to open a new matter

  • Intake team re‑keyed data for every retainer

After

  • Real‑time API push into Actionstep

  • Matter opens in < 30 seconds, doc pack auto‑generates

  • Intake workload dropped 30%

Case Study #2 – Billing Interest Calculator

When “all‑in‑one” still isn’t all in one.

Zola handles flat interest well — until a partner needs tiered rates or partial‑month proration. Our Billing Interest Calculator:

  1. Reads outstanding balances nightly

  2. Applies custom rate rules (simple or compounding)

  3. Posts line‑items back to Actionstep invoices

Result: consistent interest, zero spreadsheets, happier finance team.

My decision framework (steal it)

1. Map the non‑negotiables – trust accounting rules, bespoke workflows, states’ filing quirks.

2. Stress‑test integrations – if the partner says “we can Zapier that,” ask who maintains it when it breaks?

3. Plan the after‑care – migrations are messy; choose a team that sticks around.

“Any platform can look perfect in a demo. Ask to see how it handles the weird stuff your paralegal does every Thursday at 4 pm.”

— Eveliina, Actionstep Consultant

An arrow pointing the to the right.

FAQs

  • Yes — it’s great for solo or small firms that need built‑in accounting and don’t customize workflows.

  • Happens all the time. We’ll audit your build, keep what works, migrate what doesn’t.

  • Typical 10‑user firm: 6–8 weeks from data pull to go‑live (with us babysitting).

Ready to pick the right lane?

If you’re wrestling with workflow gaps — or just want a sanity‑check before you sign — drop me a note.

We’ll hash out whether Zola can stretch or Actionstep + some clever add‑ons will save you more grief.

Author:

Nic Perry, Mauve Morpho Owner
MBA | 8‑year Actionstep tinkerer | Occasional spreadsheet whisperer

Follow Nic on LinkedIn