Actionstep or Zola Suite?
How I decide which partner will move the needle for a law‑firm client.
“The best platform is the one that bends, without breaking, around the way your firm really works.” — Nic Perry, Founder, Mauve Morpho
Last spring, a litigation partner called me in a panic.
Their brand-new practice‑management system looked great in demos, but come Tuesday at 4 p.m., the paralegal’s “next‑docket shuffle” routine still lived in a spreadsheet and a pile of Post‑its. Automation? Zero. Morale? Same.
That’s when it clicked (again): flashy features don’t matter if the software can’t handle the weird‑but‑critical chores that keep a file moving in the real world.
So when firms ask me, “Actionstep or Zola Suite?” I skip the marketing decks and run the Tuesday‑at‑4 p.m. test.
Quick Decision Cheat Sheet
Need out-of-the-box billing & accounting with zero fuss
- Zola Suite: ✅ Native, all-in-one billing + accounting. 
- Actionstep (via Mauve Morpho): ✅ Native too—plus optional Billing Interest Calculator if you need tiered rates or partial-month proration. 
Heavy document automation & mail-merge templates
- Zola Suite: ⚠️ Limited—partners lean on Word add-ins. 
- Actionstep: ✅ Leverages Actionstep Builder + Field Helper pack for deep automation. 
Complex, multi-practice workflows
- Zola Suite: ⚠️ Can feel rigid once you leave the defaults. 
- Actionstep: ✅ Unlimited matter types and custom triggers. 
CRM-style marketing & intake
- Zola Suite: ⚠️ Basic lead-capture fields only. 
- Actionstep: ✅ Native CRM or seamless Lawmatics ↔ Actionstep integration. 
Large data migration from a legacy system
- Zola Suite: Results depend on which partner you hire. 
- Actionstep: In-house migration team—50k+ matters moved so far. 
Ongoing tweaks & support after go-live
- Zola Suite: Often time-boxed engagements. 
- Actionstep: We stay on retainer—“your favorite consultant’s consultant.” 
Why firms call us after a “good‑enough” Zola build stalls
Eveliina (our chief Actionstep consultant) stepped into a Zola project that looked finished on paper:
- “Workflows were there, but the staff still kept side spreadsheets because Zola couldn’t fire follow‑ups the way they needed.” 
- Duplicate entries crept in because tags wouldn’t sync to their marketing funnel. 
- Month‑end trust reconciliation still landed in Excel. 
We rebuilt the matter flow in Actionstep, added a one‑click ‘Next Task’ view, and the firm ditched three external spreadsheets in the first week.
Case Study #1 – Lawmatics ↔ Actionstep integration
For firms who love Zola’s built‑in CRM but outgrow its triggers.
“The minute a lead converts, everything — contacts, custom fields, documents — shoots straight into the matter. No swivel‑chair data entry.” — Nic
Before
- Manual CSV uploads from Lawmatics → Zola → errors 
- 15 min average lag to open a new matter 
- Intake team re‑keyed data for every retainer 
After
- Real‑time API push into Actionstep 
- Matter opens in < 30 seconds, doc pack auto‑generates 
- Intake workload dropped 30% 
Case Study #2 – Billing Interest Calculator
When “all‑in‑one” still isn’t all in one.
Zola handles flat interest well — until a partner needs tiered rates or partial‑month proration. Our Billing Interest Calculator:
- Reads outstanding balances nightly 
- Applies custom rate rules (simple or compounding) 
- Posts line‑items back to Actionstep invoices 
Result: consistent interest, zero spreadsheets, happier finance team.
My decision framework (steal it)
1. Map the non‑negotiables – trust accounting rules, bespoke workflows, states’ filing quirks.
2. Stress‑test integrations – if the partner says “we can Zapier that,” ask who maintains it when it breaks?
3. Plan the after‑care – migrations are messy; choose a team that sticks around.
“Any platform can look perfect in a demo. Ask to see how it handles the weird stuff your paralegal does every Thursday at 4 pm.”
— Eveliina, Actionstep Consultant
FAQs
- 
      
        
          
        
      
      Yes — it’s great for solo or small firms that need built‑in accounting and don’t customize workflows. 
- 
      
        
      
      Happens all the time. We’ll audit your build, keep what works, migrate what doesn’t. 
- 
      
        
      
      Typical 10‑user firm: 6–8 weeks from data pull to go‑live (with us babysitting). 
Ready to pick the right lane?
If you’re wrestling with workflow gaps — or just want a sanity‑check before you sign — drop me a note.
We’ll hash out whether Zola can stretch or Actionstep + some clever add‑ons will save you more grief.
Author:
Nic Perry, Mauve Morpho Owner
MBA | 8‑year Actionstep tinkerer | Occasional spreadsheet whisperer
 
                         
            
              
            
            
          
              